You cannot UN-vaccinate someone
As mentioned in my newsletter the other day, flight crews are already prone to more clotting events than the general population, which has been known since way before Corona and the mRNA substance program.
Pilots who fly commercial planes are flying with an entirely unapproved substance in their bodies. This cannot be undone! And: these "vaccines" are still in the trial phase and, as such, are governed by the "Directives for Human Experimentation"1.
The adverse events databases from around the world are reporting unprecedented numbers of adverse events from these mRNA substances, including clotting, bleeding disorders, and worse.
If a pilot's D-dimer2 levels are too high, (which can be easily shown by a simple test) it means that his/her blood is actively clotting and that they could get a pulmonary embolism, stroke, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, or even die during a flight.
Every pilot and cabin crew member who has had the jab should take that test as soon as possible.
Cumulative Risk Factors?
There are several risk factors at altitude – some are known, some less so. But most people know about the risk of blood clots. The "thin" and dry air (low oxygen levels, 20-30% humidity), the constant high cabin altitude "halfway up a mountain," (normally maintained at about 8.000 feet or ca 2400 meters) and the problem of the cabin air not at all being as clean as it is repeatedly claimed to be, will cause an accumulation of risk factors.
Some industry-friendly experts insist that inhaling toxic air is not accumulative. Here’s a thought: do you get drunk from drinking one glass of wine? No, not really. But two or three glasses or a whole bottle will definitely make you drunk. The level of toxicity (alcohol) in the liver is too high to get rid of quickly and is recycled within the body instead of being expelled. Now, if you drink several glasses every (other) day, that level will at some point be at the "the glass is full" stage. A tipping point will come one day when the liver and other organs give up and cannot process the constant “refill” of toxic material - massive health problems will arise.
This can happen when you regularly breathe in toxic fumes or when you keep putting mRNA substances into your body on top of the toxic load from the fumes, radiation, and other things.
For some people, it may take a while before they notice anything because health problems often come on slowly and then won’t be blamed on the work environment.
For some people, it hits like a bomb. One jab, or one fume event and suddenly all is not as it was before!
So, yes, it does accumulate especially over time. And no, it’s not dosis sola facit venenum only (the dose makes the poison,) but the accumulation of even tiny doses. As Professor M. Abou-Donia says, “each breath is a dose”, which will amount to a too big dose to cope with in the end. And not to forget: each person is different, there is no same dose for everybody. Plus, the “dose” comments are always based on ONE single substance not being a problem, never on the accumulative effects of a cocktail of different chemical families.
Denial
Sad to say, most aircrew still don't want to see the problem of contaminated cabin air, even though there have been warnings for more than 25 years, a large number of cases that led to medical license loss, and scientific evidence.
Trying to find the WHY?
I researched the subject of nanoparticles (NP) back in 20133, attempting to explain the possible adverse health effects on humans that can result from exposure to and inhalation of ultrafine toxic particles, in particular after inhalation of jet-engine oil fumes/smoke on aircraft.
Scientists have proposed that nanoparticles of less than 10 nm act similar to gases (i.e. carbon monoxide-CO, also a cabin air fumes factor!) and can enter human tissues easily and may disrupt the cell’s normal biochemical environment. Animal and human studies have shown that after inhalation, NPs are distributed to the liver, heart, spleen, brain, and to the lungs and gastrointestinal tract. In order to clear these NPs from the body, the components of the immune system are alarmed and activated. Animal studies have revealed that the red blood cells (RBCs), which are highly sensitive to oxidative stress, are “massively damaged by lipid nanoparticles.”
The Belgium-based Health and Environment Alliance4 explains that nano-materials are inherently toxic due to their extremely small size: "Smaller particles have a greater reactive surface area than larger particles, are more chemically reactive and produce greater numbers of reactive oxygen species that include free radicals."
Unlike larger particles, nanoparticles may be taken up by the cell’s mitochondria and nucleus. Nanoparticles can interact with proteins and enzymes and alter gene expression, affecting biological behaviour at the organ, tissue, cellular, subcellular, and protein levels. Because of this, nanoparticle toxicity may result in increased oxidative stress, inflammation, damage to proteins, membranes, and DNA, and cellular death.
Italian researchers Gatti and Montanari5 think that micro-and nano contaminants in vaccines (previously already known vaccines) could explain both immediate and delayed side effects after vaccination. This is because the "final destination" of the contaminants is likely to be different for each person. Contaminants could travel to the microbiota and interfere with the production of enzymes that are needed for important brain functions, causing symptoms weeks later, they state. This too is an effect known to those affected by toxic fumes: a delay in response called Organophosphate Induced Delayed Neuropathy (OPIDN), which causes the problem that the symptoms and their source will often not be recognized by physicians and are certainly not connected to the initial exposure.
On top of all that, the inclusion of “PEG” (Polyethylene glycol6 derived from petroleum) in Moderna and Pfizer substances is troubling, as PEG’s immunogenicity is well known. Scientific literature shows that PEG compounds often trigger the formation of anti-PEG antibodies, which in some people leads to "hypersensitivity reactions" —severe allergic reactions even with the possibility of fatal anaphylaxis.
This really means that every person receiving the jab should first be allergy tested for PEG plus the other known and unknown adjuvants and additives.
So many people say "I’m fine, I’ve never had any allergic reactions", and are surprised that they or a loved one suddenly keels over after receiving the mRNA substance. There’s a reason why people are supposed to stay put at the vaccination centre... just in case!
And why, I wonder, does the FAA7 issue a no-fly/safety interval of 48 hours to be observed by pilots following each vaccination?
There is so much more, but this, I think, is enough for today.
Have a great weekend.
Bee
References
Directives of Human Experimentation https://ori.hhs.gov/content/chapter-3-The-Protection-of-Human-Subjects-nuremberg-code-directives-human-experimentation
D-dimer test https://www.verywellhealth.com/d-dimer-test-4173338
Aerotoxic Syndrome and Low-Level Exposure to Nano-Particles – Bearnairdine Beaumont https://www.academia.edu/43384763/Aerotoxic_Syndrome_and_Low_Level_Exposure_to_Nano_Particles
Nanotechnology and health risk fact sheet. Brussels, Belgium: Health and Environment Alliance, 2008. https://www.env-health.org/IMG/pdf/17-_NANOTECHNOLOGY_AND_HEALTH_RISKS.pdf.
Gatti AM, Montanari S. New quality-control investigations on vaccines: micro-and nano contamination. Int J Vaccines Vaccin. 2017;4(1):00072. https://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/new-quality-control-investigations-on-vaccines-micro-and-nanocontamination.html.
Polyethylene Glycol-Induced Systemic Allergic Reactions (Anaphylaxis https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33011299/
FAA https://www.faa.gov/coronavirus/guidance_resources
Some information /excerpts are taken from this article: Tiny But Toxic: Nanoparticles In Vaccineshttps://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/toxic-nanoparticles-in-vaccines/
My Websites:
www.unfiltered.vip
https://bearnairdinebeaumont.academia.edu/